GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 6850 X2

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 6850 X2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 6850 X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K240Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Measures 1mm instead of 285mm, a 284mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
42.9% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6850 X2

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 42.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌28400% longer card at 285mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K240Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (2,541 vs 2,534), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K240Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6850 X2 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $350 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 42.5% (7.2 vs 5.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6850 X2 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID K240Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 6850 X2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K240Q

The GRID K240Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.

Radeon HD 6850 X2

The Radeon HD 6850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 960 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 254W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,534 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K240Q scores 2,541 and the Radeon HD 6850 X2 reaches 2,534 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K240Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6850 X2 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K240Q) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6850 X2). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K240Q) vs 1.536 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6850 X2).

Feature	GRID K240Q	Radeon HD 6850 X2
G3D Mark Score	2,541	2,534
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1536+60%	960 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+49%	1.536 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs	32	32 ×2
TMUs	128+167%	48 ×2
L1 Cache	128 KB	192 KB+50%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K240Q	Radeon HD 6850 X2
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K240Q and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6850 X2.

Feature	GRID K240Q	Radeon HD 6850 X2
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K240Q) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6850 X2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	GRID K240Q	Radeon HD 6850 X2
DirectX	11_0	11.2+2%
Max Displays	0	4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K240Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 6850 X2's 254W — a 12.1% difference. The GRID K240Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K240Q) vs 600W (Radeon HD 6850 X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 285mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GRID K240Q	Radeon HD 6850 X2
TDP	225W-11%	254W
Recommended PSU	350W-42%	600W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 8-pin
Length	1mm	285mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	11.3+13%	10.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K240Q came in at $500, while the Radeon HD 6850 X2 launched at $350. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6850 X2 was 30% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (GRID K240Q) vs 7.2 (Radeon HD 6850 X2) — the Radeon HD 6850 X2 offers 41.2% better value. The newer card here is GRID K240Q (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	GRID K240Q	Radeon HD 6850 X2
MSRP	$500	$350-30%
Performance per Dollar	5.1	7.2+41%
Codename	GK104	Barts
Release	June 28 2013	September 19 2011
Ranking	#628	#630

Search GRID K240Q on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6850 X2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.