
GRID M10-4Q
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6970
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID M10-4Q
2016Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌660.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,805 MSRPvs$369 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 7.7 G3D/$ ($2,805 MSRP vs $369 MSRP).
Radeon HD 6970
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,436 less on MSRP ($369 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 622.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.7 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($369 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GRID M10-4Q
2016Radeon HD 6970
2010Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,436 less on MSRP ($369 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 622.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.7 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($369 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌660.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,805 MSRPvs$369 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 7.7 G3D/$ ($2,805 MSRP vs $369 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GRID M10-4Q better than Radeon HD 6970?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 6970 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 14 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 10 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 32 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-4Q and Radeon HD 6970

GRID M10-4Q
GRID M10-4Q
The GRID M10-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,977 points.

Radeon HD 6970
Radeon HD 6970
The Radeon HD 6970 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,831 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GRID M10-4Q scores 2,977 versus the Radeon HD 6970's 2,831 — the GRID M10-4Q leads by 5.2%. The GRID M10-4Q is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6970 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-4Q) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6970). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-4Q) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6970). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 880 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,977+5% | 2,831 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1536+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+62% |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz+48% | 880 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 96+140% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+67% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-4Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6970) — the GRID M10-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-4Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 6970's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID M10-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-4Q) vs 550W (Radeon HD 6970). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-10% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | — | 286mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.2+17% | 11.3 |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-4Q launched at $2805 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 6970 launched at $369. The Radeon HD 6970 costs 86.8% less ($2436 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.1 (GRID M10-4Q) vs 7.7 (Radeon HD 6970) — the Radeon HD 6970 offers 600% better value. The GRID M10-4Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2805 | $369-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.1 | 7.7+600% |
| Codename | GM107 | Cayman |
| Release | May 18 2016 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #622 | #596 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












