
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce 940MX

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Popular choices:

GeForce 940MX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 940MX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 940MX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | GeForce 940MX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and GeForce 940MX

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.

GeForce 940MX
The GeForce 940MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 861 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 23W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,509 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 scores 1,538 and the GeForce 940MX reaches 1,509 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is built on Generation 8.0 while the GeForce 940MX uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 512 (GeForce 940MX). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 0.8817 TFLOPS (GeForce 940MX). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 861 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | GeForce 940MX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,538+2% | 1,509 |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8448 TFLOPS | 0.8817 TFLOPS+4% |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz+28% | 861 MHz |
| ROPs | 6 | 8+33% |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | GeForce 940MX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 940MX has 512 MB. The GeForce 940MX offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | GeForce 940MX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 draws 15W versus the GeForce 940MX's 23W — a 42.1% difference. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 350W (GeForce 940MX). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | GeForce 940MX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-35% | 23W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 102.5+56% | 65.6 |
Value Analysis
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce 940MX launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 30.2 (GeForce 940MX) — the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce 940MX is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | GeForce 940MX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 30.2 |
| Codename | Broadwell GT3e | GM107 |
| Release | September 5 2014 | June 28 2016 |
| Ranking | #763 | #764 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















