
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Why is GeForce RTX 3050 8GB better than Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200?
Comparing the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 to the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB demonstrates the massive jump from high-end 2015 integrated graphics to a modern dedicated desktop GPU. The Iris Pro 6200 was Intel's flagship integrated solution of the Broadwell era, featuring 128MB of eDRAM to boost its performance. The RTX 3050 8GB is a 2022 desktop card designed for solid 1080p gaming with modern features.\n\nThe performance difference is staggering, with the RTX 3050 8GB being roughly 10 to 12 times more powerful in gaming benchmarks. It introduces hardware-accelerated Ray Tracing and AI-powered upscaling (DLSS), features that are entirely absent on the integrated chip. While the Iris Pro 6200 was once capable of handling light gaming and HD media, it now lacks the driver support and raw horsepower for modern titles. The RTX card's dedicated 8GB of VRAM allows for high-fidelity textures that would easily overwhelm the shared system memory of the Intel processor.\n\nUltimately, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for any current gaming or creative workstation. The Intel Iris Pro 6200 remains a respected milestone in integrated graphics history, but for today's standards, it has been vastly outclassed. Moving to a dedicated 30-series card represents a night-and-day difference in resolution and overall visual quality.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is significantly newer (2022 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 715% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
| Insight | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-715%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+715%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 scores 1,538 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 715%. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is built on Generation 8.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,538 | 12,535+715% |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2560+567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8448 TFLOPS | 9.098 TFLOPS+977% |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1777 MHz+62% |
| ROPs | 6 | 32+433% |
| TMUs | 48 | 80+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 draws 15W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 158.6% difference. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-88% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 66°C |
| Perf/Watt | 102.5+6% | 96.4 |
Value Analysis
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 and now averages $209. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 costs 100+% less ($209 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $209 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 60.0 |
| Codename | Broadwell GT3e | GA106 |
| Release | September 5 2014 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #763 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















