Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
VS
GeForce GTX 1060

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GTX 1060

Intel

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

2014Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 554.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (6 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200.

InsightIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200GeForce GTX 1060
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-554.4%)
Leading raw performance (+554.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1060 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and GeForce GTX 1060

Intel

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 scores 1,538 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 554.4%. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is built on Generation 8.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1733 MHz.

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200GeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score
1,538
10,064+554%
Architecture
Generation 8.0
Pascal
Process Node
14 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
384
2560+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8448 TFLOPS
8.873 TFLOPS+950%
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1733 MHz+58%
ROPs
6
64+967%
TMUs
48
160+233%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200GeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 192-bit.

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200GeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
6 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
192 GB/s
Bus Width
System
192-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 169.2% difference. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: Integrated vs 6-pin.

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200GeForce GTX 1060
TDP
15W-92%
180W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
400W
Power Connector
Integrated
6-pin
Length
173mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
102.5+83%
55.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 costs 100+% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200GeForce GTX 1060
MSRP
$0-100%
$249
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$60
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
167.7
Codename
Broadwell GT3e
GP104
Release
September 5 2014
May 27 2016
Ranking
#763
#137