Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GRID M10-1B
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Popular choices:
GRID M10-1B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-1B
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID M10-1B offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and GRID M10-1B
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.
GRID M10-1B
The GRID M10-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,504 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 scores 1,538 and the GRID M10-1B reaches 1,504 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is built on Generation 8.0 while the GRID M10-1B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-1B). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1B). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,538+2% | 1,504 |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2048+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8448 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+471% |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1178 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 6 | 64+967% |
| TMUs | 48 | 128+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-1B has 512 MB. The GRID M10-1B offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 draws 15W versus the GRID M10-1B's 225W — a 175% difference. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 350W (GRID M10-1B). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 102.5+1430% | 6.7 |
Value Analysis
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GRID M10-1B launched at $2500 and now averages $150. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 costs 100+% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 10.0 (GRID M10-1B) — the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers Infinity% better value. The GRID M10-1B is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 10.0 |
| Codename | Broadwell GT3e | GM204 |
| Release | September 5 2014 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #763 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and GRID M10-1B
