
Quadro K5000
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M390X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro K5000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌354.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$550 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $550 MSRP).
- ❌62.7% higher power demand at 122W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,949 less on MSRP ($550 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 343.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($550 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 122W, a 47W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quadro K5000
2012Radeon R9 M390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,949 less on MSRP ($550 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 343.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($550 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 122W, a 47W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌354.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$550 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $550 MSRP).
- ❌62.7% higher power demand at 122W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro K5000 better than Radeon R9 M390X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R9 M390X make more sense than Quadro K5000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro K5000 | Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro K5000 | Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 17 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro K5000 | Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro K5000 | Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K5000 and Radeon R9 M390X

Quadro K5000
Quadro K5000
The Quadro K5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 17 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 706 MHz to 706 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,989 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon R9 M390X
Radeon R9 M390X
The Radeon R9 M390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,895 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K5000 scores 3,989 and the Radeon R9 M390X reaches 3,895 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M390X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K5000) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M390X). Raw compute: 2.169 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M390X).
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,989+2% | 3,895 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2048+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.169 TFLOPS | 2.961 TFLOPS+37% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K5000 draws 122W versus the Radeon R9 M390X's 75W — a 47.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M390X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5000) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M390X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 122W | 75W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.7 | 51.9+59% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K5000 launched at $2499 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M390X launched at $550. The Radeon R9 M390X costs 78% less ($1949 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Quadro K5000) vs 7.1 (Radeon R9 M390X) — the Radeon R9 M390X offers 343.8% better value. The Radeon R9 M390X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $550-78% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.6 | 7.1+344% |
| Codename | GK104 | Amethyst |
| Release | August 17 2012 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #492 | #504 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












