Quadro K5000 vs Radeon R9 M390X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K5000 vs Radeon R9 M390X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K5000 vs Radeon R9 M390X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K5000

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M390X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
354.4% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$550 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $550 MSRP).
❌62.7% higher power demand at 122W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M390X

2015

Why buy it

✅23.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,949 less on MSRP ($550 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 343.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($550 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 122W, a 47W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M390X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K5000 instead at 3,989 vs 3,895, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K5000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M390X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,949 cheaper on MSRP at $550 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 343.7% (7.1 vs 1.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M390X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K5000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K5000 vs Radeon R9 M390X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K5000

The Quadro K5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 17 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 706 MHz to 706 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,989 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon R9 M390X

The Radeon R9 M390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,895 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5000 scores 3,989 and the Radeon R9 M390X reaches 3,895 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M390X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K5000) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M390X). Raw compute: 2.169 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M390X).

Feature	Quadro K5000	Radeon R9 M390X
G3D Mark Score	3,989+2%	3,895
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536	2048+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.169 TFLOPS	2.961 TFLOPS+37%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128	128
L1 Cache	128 KB	512 KB+300%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K5000	Radeon R9 M390X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K5000 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M390X.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Radeon R9 M390X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5000 draws 122W versus the Radeon R9 M390X's 75W — a 47.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M390X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5000) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M390X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Radeon R9 M390X
TDP	122W	75W-39%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	267mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	32.7	51.9+59%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K5000 came in at $2499, while the Radeon R9 M390X launched at $550. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M390X was 78% cheaper ($1949 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Quadro K5000) vs 7.1 (Radeon R9 M390X) — the Radeon R9 M390X offers 343.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M390X (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	Quadro K5000	Radeon R9 M390X
MSRP	$2499	$550-78%
Performance per Dollar	1.6	7.1+344%
Codename	GK104	Amethyst
Release	August 17 2012	May 5 2015
Ranking	#492	#504

Search Quadro K5000 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M390X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.