Quadro K5000 vs Radeon R9 M390X

NVIDIA

Quadro K5000

2012Core: 706 MHzBoost: 706 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M390X

2015Core: 723 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro K5000

2012

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 354.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,499 MSRPvs$550 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $550 MSRP).
  • 62.7% higher power demand at 122W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M390X

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,949 less on MSRP ($550 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 343.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($550 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 122W, a 47W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro K5000 better than Radeon R9 M390X?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,989 vs 3,895 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro K5000 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K5000 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro K5000 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro K5000 is about 354.4% more expensive on MSRP at $2,499 MSRP versus $550 MSRP, and you are getting 2.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 M390X really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Radeon R9 M390X make more sense than Quadro K5000?
Yes. Radeon R9 M390X is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 122W), and staying closer to $550 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro K5000. The trade-off is that Quadro K5000 currently gives you 2.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 M390X still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro K5000Radeon R9 M390X
1080p
low78 FPS81 FPS
medium67 FPS69 FPS
high53 FPS57 FPS
ultra35 FPS37 FPS
1440p
low68 FPS71 FPS
medium60 FPS62 FPS
high42 FPS45 FPS
ultra27 FPS29 FPS
4K
low25 FPS26 FPS
medium23 FPS24 FPS
high15 FPS16 FPS
ultra13 FPS14 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro K5000Radeon R9 M390X
1080p
low80 FPS91 FPS
medium57 FPS69 FPS
high44 FPS57 FPS
ultra29 FPS40 FPS
1440p
low45 FPS54 FPS
medium29 FPS38 FPS
high22 FPS29 FPS
ultra15 FPS21 FPS
4K
low17 FPS22 FPS
medium11 FPS16 FPS
high9 FPS12 FPS
ultra7 FPS9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro K5000Radeon R9 M390X
1080p
low180 FPS175 FPS
medium144 FPS140 FPS
high120 FPS117 FPS
ultra90 FPS88 FPS
1440p
low135 FPS131 FPS
medium108 FPS105 FPS
high90 FPS88 FPS
ultra67 FPS66 FPS
4K
low90 FPS88 FPS
medium72 FPS70 FPS
high60 FPS58 FPS
ultra45 FPS44 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro K5000Radeon R9 M390X
1080p
low131 FPS172 FPS
medium103 FPS140 FPS
high88 FPS117 FPS
ultra71 FPS88 FPS
1440p
low99 FPS122 FPS
medium79 FPS102 FPS
high68 FPS88 FPS
ultra51 FPS66 FPS
4K
low58 FPS72 FPS
medium44 FPS56 FPS
high35 FPS45 FPS
ultra24 FPS30 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K5000 and Radeon R9 M390X

NVIDIA

Quadro K5000

The Quadro K5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 17 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 706 MHz to 706 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,989 points. Launch price was $2,499.

AMD

Radeon R9 M390X

The Radeon R9 M390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,895 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5000 scores 3,989 and the Radeon R9 M390X reaches 3,895 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M390X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K5000) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M390X). Raw compute: 2.169 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M390X).

FeatureQuadro K5000Radeon R9 M390X
G3D Mark Score
3,989+2%
3,895
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536
2048+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.169 TFLOPS
2.961 TFLOPS+37%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128
128
L1 Cache
128 KB
512 KB+300%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K5000Radeon R9 M390X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureQuadro K5000Radeon R9 M390X
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5000 draws 122W versus the Radeon R9 M390X's 75W — a 47.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M390X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5000) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M390X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureQuadro K5000Radeon R9 M390X
TDP
122W
75W-39%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
267mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
32.7
51.9+59%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro K5000 launched at $2499 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M390X launched at $550. The Radeon R9 M390X costs 78% less ($1949 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Quadro K5000) vs 7.1 (Radeon R9 M390X) — the Radeon R9 M390X offers 343.8% better value. The Radeon R9 M390X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureQuadro K5000Radeon R9 M390X
MSRP
$2499
$550-78%
Performance per Dollar
1.6
7.1+344%
Codename
GK104
Amethyst
Release
August 17 2012
May 5 2015
Ranking
#492
#504