Quadro K5000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

CPU

GPU

Quadro K5000

2012Core: 706 MHzBoost: 706 MHz

Similar parts

··

Buy on Amazon

Radeon RX Vega M GL

2018Core: 931 MHzBoost: 1011 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Quadro K5000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL Performance Spectrum

Quadro K5000

4 GB 122

3,989

+2.1%

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design

3,906

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K5000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K5000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K5000

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
✅Radeon RX Vega M GL is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro K5000 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega M GL across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1566% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 26.0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌87.7% higher power demand at 122W vs 65W.

Radeon RX Vega M GL

2018

Why buy it

✅9.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $2,349 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1531.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 122W, a 57W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX Vega M GL is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K5000 instead at 3,989 vs 3,906, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K5000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX Vega M GL makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,349 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1531.3% (26.0 vs 1.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Radeon RX Vega M GL is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K5000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K5000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K5000

The Quadro K5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 17 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 706 MHz to 706 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,989 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon RX Vega M GL

The Radeon RX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,906 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5000 scores 3,989 and the Radeon RX Vega M GL reaches 3,906 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX Vega M GL uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K5000) vs 1,280 (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Raw compute: 2.169 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000) vs 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Boost clocks: 706 MHz vs 1011 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Radeon RX Vega M GL
G3D Mark Score	3,989+2%	3,906
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1536+20%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.169 TFLOPS	2.588 TFLOPS+19%
Boost Clock	706 MHz	1011 MHz+43%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128+60%	80
L1 Cache	128 KB	320 KB+150%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K5000	Radeon RX Vega M GL
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K5000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GL carries 0 MB. Quadro K5000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K5000 and 1024-bit on the Radeon RX Vega M GL. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K5000) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GL) — the Radeon RX Vega M GL has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Radeon RX Vega M GL
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	HBM2
Bus Width	64-bit	1024-bit+1500%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Quadro K5000) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Radeon RX Vega M GL
DirectX	12_0	12 (12_1)
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro K5000) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 6.3.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Radeon RX Vega M GL
Encoder	NVENC 2nd Gen	VCE 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC 1st Gen	UVD 6.3
Codecs	—	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5000 draws 122W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GL's 65W — a 61% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5000) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Radeon RX Vega M GL
TDP	122W	65W-47%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	32.7	60.1+84%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K5000 came in at $2499, while the Radeon RX Vega M GL launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega M GL was 94% cheaper ($2349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Quadro K5000) vs 26.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) — the Radeon RX Vega M GL offers 1525% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega M GL (2018 vs 2012).

Feature	Quadro K5000	Radeon RX Vega M GL
MSRP	$2499	$150-94%
Performance per Dollar	1.6	26.0+1525%
Codename	GK104	Polaris 22
Release	August 17 2012	February 1 2018
Ranking	#492	#500

Search Quadro K5000 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX Vega M GL on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.