Quadro P2000
VS
GeForce RTX 4060

Quadro P2000 vs GeForce RTX 4060

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000

2017Core: 1076 MHzBoost: 1480 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

2023Core: 1830 MHzBoost: 2460 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P2000 is positioned at rank #89 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000

#49
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
93%
#50
92%
#51
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015
90%
#52
RTX A1000
MSRP: $749|Avg: $500
88%
#54
Radeon Pro 5700
MSRP: $799|Avg: $250
88%
#55
Quadro P4000
MSRP: $815|Avg: $290
86%
#74
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
901%
#89
Quadro P2000
MSRP: $425|Avg: $190
100%
#90
Quadro T1000
MSRP: $400|Avg: $425
99%
#93
Radeon Pro 580
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
95%
#94
T1000 8GB
MSRP: $500|Avg: $380
94%
#99
Quadro K620
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
90%
#100
Tesla K20Xm
MSRP: $7699|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
111%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
107%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
105%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
105%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
105%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
104%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
103%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
103%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
102%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
101%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
100%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
100%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
98%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
98%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
98%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
97%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
96%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
95%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
94%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
94%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
92%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
92%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
92%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
91%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
91%
#26
Radeon RX 7700 XT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
91%
#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 180.7% higher G3D Mark score and 60% more VRAM (8 GB vs 5 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P2000.

InsightQuadro P2000GeForce RTX 4060
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-180.7%)
Leading raw performance (+180.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $299 (vs $190), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 78.4% better value per dollar than the Quadro P2000.

InsightQuadro P2000GeForce RTX 4060
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+78.4%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($190)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2000 and GeForce RTX 4060

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000

The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro P2000 scores 6,964 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 180.7%. The Quadro P2000 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro P2000) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 2460 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P2000GeForce RTX 4060
G3D Mark Score
6,964
19,548+181%
Architecture
Pascal
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
16 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
1024
3072+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.031 TFLOPS
15.11 TFLOPS+399%
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
2460 MHz+66%
ROPs
40
48+20%
TMUs
64
96+50%
L1 Cache
0.38 MB
3 MB+689%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB
24 MB+1820%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P2000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureQuadro P2000GeForce RTX 4060
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 3.5
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P2000 comes with 5 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P2000GeForce RTX 4060
VRAM Capacity
5 GB
8 GB+60%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
1.25 MB
24 MB+1820%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P2000) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro P2000GeForce RTX 4060
DirectX
12.0
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).

FeatureQuadro P2000GeForce RTX 4060
Encoder
NVENC 6.0
NVENC 8th gen
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP8
NVDEC 5th gen
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2000 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 42.1% difference. The Quadro P2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 201mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureQuadro P2000GeForce RTX 4060
TDP
75W-35%
115W
Recommended PSU
350W-36%
550W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
201mm
240mm
Height
112mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
73°C
Perf/Watt
92.9
170.0+83%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P2000 launched at $425 MSRP and currently averages $190, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 and now averages $299. The Quadro P2000 costs 36.5% less ($109 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.7 (Quadro P2000) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 78.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).

FeatureQuadro P2000GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP
$425
$299-30%
Avg Price (30d)
$190-36%
$299
Performance per Dollar
36.7
65.4+78%
Codename
GP106
AD107
Release
February 6 2017
May 18 2023
Ranking
#346
#84