
Quadro P620 vs P104-100

Quadro P620
Popular choices:

P104-100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P620 is positioned at rank #74 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P620
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P620 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P620 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The P104-100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the P104-100.
| Insight | Quadro P620 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The P104-100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $48 for the Quadro P620, it costs 79% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 377.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P620 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+377.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($48) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P620 and P104-100

Quadro P620
The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.

P104-100
The P104-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P620 scores 3,698 and the P104-100 reaches 3,678 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P620 is built on Pascal while the P104-100 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro P620) vs 1,920 (P104-100). Raw compute: 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620) vs 6.655 TFLOPS (P104-100). Boost clocks: 1443 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,698 | 3,678 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1920+275% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.478 TFLOPS | 6.655 TFLOPS+350% |
| Boost Clock | 1443 MHz | 1733 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 120+275% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 720 KB+275% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P620 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro P620) vs 2 MB (P104-100) — the P104-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P620 draws 40W versus the P104-100's 30W — a 28.6% difference. The P104-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P620) vs 350W (P104-100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W | 30W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 92.5 | 122.6+33% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P620 launched at $170 MSRP and currently averages $48, while the P104-100 launched at $0 and now averages $10. The P104-100 costs 79.2% less ($38 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 77.0 (Quadro P620) vs 367.8 (P104-100) — the P104-100 offers 377.7% better value. The Quadro P620 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P620 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $170 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $48 | $10-79% |
| Performance per Dollar | 77.0 | 367.8+378% |
| Codename | GP107 | GP104 |
| Release | February 1 2018 | December 12 2017 |
| Ranking | #524 | #529 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















