Quadro P620 vs GeForce GTX 880M
Quadro P620
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 880M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P620 is positioned at rank 74 and the GeForce GTX 880M is on rank 116, so the Quadro P620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P620
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 880M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P620 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P620 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 880M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 880M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P620.
| Insight | Quadro P620 | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $48 versus $150 for the GeForce GTX 880M, it costs 68% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 202% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P620 | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+202%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($48) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P620 and GeForce GTX 880M
Quadro P620
The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.
GeForce GTX 880M
The GeForce GTX 880M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,826 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P620 scores 3,698 and the GeForce GTX 880M reaches 3,826 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P620 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 880M uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro P620) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 880M). Raw compute: 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620) vs 3.05 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 880M). Boost clocks: 1443 MHz vs 993 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,698 | 3,826+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1536+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.478 TFLOPS | 3.05 TFLOPS+106% |
| Boost Clock | 1443 MHz+45% | 993 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P620 | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P620 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 880M has 8 GB. The GeForce GTX 880M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro P620) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 880M) — the Quadro P620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620) vs 12_0 (GeForce GTX 880M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL12_1) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 880M). Decoder: NVDEC vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P620 draws 40W versus the GeForce GTX 880M's 122W — a 101.2% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P620) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 880M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-67% | 122W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 1mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 92.5+195% | 31.4 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P620 costs 68% less ($102 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 77.0 (Quadro P620) vs 25.5 (GeForce GTX 880M) — the Quadro P620 offers 202% better value. The Quadro P620 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro P620 | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $170 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $48-68% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 77.0+202% | 25.5 |
| Codename | GP107 | GK104 |
| Release | February 1 2018 | March 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #524 | #514 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P620 and GeForce GTX 880M
