Quadro P620 vs Radeon RX 7600
Quadro P620
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P620 is positioned at rank #74 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P620
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 348.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P620.
| Insight | Quadro P620 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-348.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+348.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $48 versus $250 for the Radeon RX 7600, it costs 81% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 16.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P620 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+16.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($48) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P620 and Radeon RX 7600
Quadro P620
The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro P620 scores 3,698 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 348.4%. The Quadro P620 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro P620) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 1443 MHz vs 2655 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,698 | 16,581+348% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2048+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.478 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+1372% |
| Boost Clock | 1443 MHz | 2655 MHz+84% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 512 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P620 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P620 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro P620) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro P620) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P620 draws 40W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 122% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P620) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-76% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 145mm | 240mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 92.5 | 100.5+9% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P620 launched at $170 MSRP and currently averages $48, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 and now averages $250. The Quadro P620 costs 80.8% less ($202 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 77.0 (Quadro P620) vs 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Quadro P620 offers 16.1% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $170-37% | $269 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $48-81% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 77.0+16% | 66.3 |
| Codename | GP107 | Navi 33 |
| Release | February 1 2018 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #524 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P620 and Radeon RX 7600
