Quadro P620 vs GeForce MX450
Quadro P620
Popular choices:
GeForce MX450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P620 is positioned at rank 74 and the GeForce MX450 is on rank 307, so the Quadro P620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P620
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX450
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P620.
| Insight | Quadro P620 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $48 versus $200 for the GeForce MX450, it costs 76% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 314.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P620 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+314.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($48) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P620 and GeForce MX450
Quadro P620
The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.
GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P620 scores 3,698 and the GeForce MX450 reaches 3,720 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P620 is built on Pascal while the GeForce MX450 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro P620) vs 896 (GeForce MX450). Raw compute: 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450). Boost clocks: 1443 MHz vs 1575 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,698 | 3,720 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 896+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.478 TFLOPS | 3.226 TFLOPS+118% |
| Boost Clock | 1443 MHz | 1575 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P620 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P620 draws 40W versus the GeForce MX450's 25W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P620) vs 350W (GeForce MX450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W | 25W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 92.5 | 148.8+61% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P620 launched at $170 MSRP and currently averages $48, while the GeForce MX450 launched at $250 and now averages $200. The Quadro P620 costs 76% less ($152 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 77.0 (Quadro P620) vs 18.6 (GeForce MX450) — the Quadro P620 offers 314% better value. The GeForce MX450 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro P620 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $170-32% | $250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $48-76% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 77.0+314% | 18.6 |
| Codename | GP107 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | February 1 2018 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #524 | #523 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P620 and GeForce MX450
