
Quadro P620

Radeon HD 7970M
Quadro P620 vs Radeon HD 7970M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P620 vs Radeon HD 7970M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P620 vs Radeon HD 7970M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P620
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Radeon HD 7970M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P620 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 100W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7970M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon HD 7970M
2012Why buy it
- ✅43.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 100W vs 40W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P620 vs Radeon HD 7970M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P620
The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.

Radeon HD 7970M
The Radeon HD 7970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,663 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P620 scores 3,698 and the Radeon HD 7970M reaches 3,663 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P620 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 7970M uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro P620) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 7970M). Raw compute: 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620) vs 2.176 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7970M).
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,698 | 3,663 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1280+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.478 TFLOPS | 2.176 TFLOPS+47% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 320 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P620 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7970M carries 4 GB. Radeon HD 7970M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro P620 and System on the Radeon HD 7970M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro P620) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 7970M) — the Quadro P620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7970M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7970M). Decoder: NVDEC vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro P620) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 7970M).
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P620 draws 40W versus the Radeon HD 7970M's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P620) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7970M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-60% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 92.5+153% | 36.6 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Quadro P620 (2018 vs 2012).
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $170 | — |
| Codename | GP107 | Wimbledon |
| Release | February 1 2018 | April 24 2012 |
| Ranking | #524 | #531 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














