Quadro vs Radeon R9 270X
Quadro
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 270X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro is positioned at rank #215 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R9 270X is significantly newer (2013 vs 1999). The Radeon R9 270X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 270X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (1999 / Celsius (1999−2005)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 270X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 270X holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $50), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 21.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+21.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro and Radeon R9 270X
Quadro
The Quadro is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 1999. It features the Celsius architecture. The core clock speed is 135 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 220 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Radeon R9 270X
The Radeon R9 270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,874 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro scores 5,000 and the Radeon R9 270X reaches 4,874 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro is built on Celsius while the Radeon R9 270X uses GCN 1.0, both on 220 nm vs 28 nm.
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000+3% | 4,874 |
| Architecture | Celsius | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 220 nm | 28 nm |
| ROPs | 4 | 32+700% |
| TMUs | 4 | 80+1900% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 270X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Quadro) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270X). Decoder: MPEG-2 Acceleration vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (Quadro) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 270X).
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Acceleration | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 270X's 180W — a 82.4% difference. The Quadro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-58% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Height | — | 109mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 C |
| Perf/Watt | 66.7+146% | 27.1 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R9 270X launched at $199 and now averages $40. The Radeon R9 270X costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 100.0 (Quadro) vs 121.8 (Radeon R9 270X) — the Radeon R9 270X offers 21.8% better value. The Radeon R9 270X is the newer GPU (2013 vs 1999).
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $199-80% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $40-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 100.0 | 121.8+22% |
| Codename | NV10 | Curacao |
| Release | 1999 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #900 | #448 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro and Radeon R9 270X
