
Radeon Pro WX 7130
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro WX 7130
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 165W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌271.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅69.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $731 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 862.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌26.9% higher power demand at 165W vs 130W.
Radeon Pro WX 7130
2016Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 165W, a 35W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅69.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $731 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 862.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌271.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌26.9% higher power demand at 165W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7600 better than Radeon Pro WX 7130?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 7130 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 288 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 597 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 187 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 187 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 7130 and Radeon RX 7600

Radeon Pro WX 7130
Radeon Pro WX 7130
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro WX 7130 scores 6,406 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 158.8%. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 1243 MHz vs 2655 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,406 | 16,581+159% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.728 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+280% |
| Boost Clock | 1243 MHz | 2655 MHz+114% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 144+13% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+13% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 23.7% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-21% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 49.3 | 100.5+104% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 73.1% less ($731 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 61.6 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 862.5% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $269-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.4 | 61.6+863% |
| Codename | Ellesmere | Navi 33 |
| Release | November 10 2016 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #331 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












