
Arc Graphics 140T vs GeForce RTX 2060

Arc Graphics 140T
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc Graphics 140T is positioned at rank #330 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140T
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 140T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The Arc Graphics 140T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce RTX 2060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 213.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (6 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140T.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-213.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+213.6%) |
| Longevity | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140T, it costs 60% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 684.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+684.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140T and GeForce RTX 2060

Arc Graphics 140T
The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc Graphics 140T scores 4,500 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 213.6%. The Arc Graphics 140T is built on Xe+ while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 2350 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500 | 14,114+214% |
| Architecture | Xe+ | Turing |
| Shading Units | 8 | 1920+23900% |
| Boost Clock | 2350 MHz+40% | 1680 MHz |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+167% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140T comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+167% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140T draws 35W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 128.2% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 72.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-78% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 72-15% |
| Perf/Watt | 128.6+46% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 140T launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 60% less ($180 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.0 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 684% better value. The Arc Graphics 140T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $120-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.0 | 117.6+684% |
| Codename | — | TU106 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #409 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












