Arc Graphics 140T vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Arc Graphics 140T
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc Graphics 140T is positioned at rank #330 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140T
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Why is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Arc Graphics 140T?
Comparing the dedicated GeForce RTX 3050 8GB with Intel’s integrated Arc Graphics 140T highlights the closing gap between entry-level discrete GPUs and high-end integrated graphics. As of 2025-2026, Intel’s Arc 140T (found in the latest Core Ultra processors) has become a formidable competitor, offering performance that rivals or even slightly exceeds the desktop RTX 3050 in some 1080p scenarios when paired with fast dual-channel memory. However, the dedicated RTX 3050 8GB still holds an advantage in VRAM stability and consistent performance across a wider range of titles.
Technically, the RTX 3050 8GB has the benefit of dedicated GDDR6 memory, which doesn't rely on the system RAM, whereas the Arc 140T shares memory with the CPU. This gives the NVIDIA card a significant edge in games with high texture requirements. On the other hand, the Arc 140T is a miracle of efficiency, integrated directly into the processor and consuming very little power. It also supports modern features like XeSS upscaling and hardware-accelerated AV1 encoding, which perform exceptionally well for an integrated solution.
For budget-conscious builders or those looking for a thin-and-light laptop without a dedicated GPU, the Intel Arc Graphics 140T is a winner for casual 1080p gaming. However, if you are building a dedicated desktop and want the most reliable performance for modern AAA titles with better ray-tracing support and dedicated VRAM, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB remains the safer bet. The Arc 140T wins on value and integration, but the RTX 3050 wins on consistent, dedicated throughput.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 164.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140T.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-164.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+164.3%) |
| Longevity | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140T, it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 428.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+428.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140T and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Arc Graphics 140T
The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc Graphics 140T scores 4,500 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 164.3%. The Arc Graphics 140T is built on Xe+ while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 2350 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500 | 11,892+164% |
| Architecture | Xe+ | Ampere |
| Shading Units | 8 | 2560+31900% |
| Boost Clock | 2350 MHz+34% | 1755 MHz |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140T comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140T draws 35W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 115.2% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 235mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-73% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 235mm |
| Height | 0mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 128.6+41% | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 140T launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 50% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.0 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 428.7% better value. The Arc Graphics 140T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | $249-29% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $150-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.0 | 79.3+429% |
| Codename | — | GA106 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #409 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 140T and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
