
Arc Graphics 140T vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Arc Graphics 140T
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc Graphics 140T is positioned at rank #330 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140T
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Why is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Arc Graphics 140T?
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a powerful discrete desktop graphics card that significantly outperforms the Intel Arc Graphics 140T, an integrated GPU solution. While the Arc 140T handles basic tasks and entry-level gaming in mobile devices, the RTX 3060 Ti is designed for high-performance 1080p and 1440p gaming, offering over 250% higher performance in most workloads.
Equipped with 8GB of GDDR6 memory and 4,864 CUDA cores, the RTX 3060 Ti features hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS support, making it a staple for enthusiast gaming. In contrast, the Arc 140T is integrated into mobile processors like the Core Ultra series, sharing system memory and operating at much lower power limits (35W vs 200W).
For users deciding between these two, the RTX 3060 Ti is the clear winner for any serious gaming or creative work. The Arc Graphics 140T is best suited for ultra-portable laptops where battery life and portability are prioritized over raw graphical power.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 351.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140T.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-351.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+351.4%) |
| Longevity | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $280 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140T, it costs 7% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 383.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+383.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($280) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140T and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Arc Graphics 140T
The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc Graphics 140T scores 4,500 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 351.4%. The Arc Graphics 140T is built on Xe+ while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 2350 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500 | 20,312+351% |
| Architecture | Xe+ | Ampere |
| Shading Units | 8 | 4864+60700% |
| Boost Clock | 2350 MHz+41% | 1665 MHz |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140T comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140T draws 35W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 140.4% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-83% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 128.6+27% | 101.6 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 140T launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $280. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 6.7% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.0 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 383.3% better value. The Arc Graphics 140T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350-12% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $280-7% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.0 | 72.5+383% |
| Codename | — | GA104 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #409 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















