Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Arc Graphics 140T vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

CPUCPUGPUGPU
Intel

Arc Graphics 140T

2025Boost: 2350 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
RTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon

Arc Graphics 140T vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Performance Spectrum

Arc Graphics 140T
Shared 35
4,500
0.0%
brand logoArc 8-Core iGPU
brand logoArc A550M
brand logoArc A770
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
8 GB 200
20,312
+351.4%
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Super with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 SLI
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
brand logoRTX 5000 Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 140T vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 140T

2025

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 35W instead of 200W, a 165W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,500 vs 20,312).
  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • ❌2025 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.9 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅+351.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Delivers 295.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 12.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
  • ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌471.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 351.4% in PassMark G3D (20,312 vs 4,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of Unknown node, and 38 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $350, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 295.9% (50.9 vs 12.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Arc Graphics 140T vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc Graphics 140T

The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Arc Graphics 140T scores 4,500 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 351.4%. The Arc Graphics 140T is built on Xe+ while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 2350 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureArc Graphics 140TGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
G3D Mark Score
4,500
20,312+351%
Architecture
Xe+
Ampere
Shading Units
8
4864+60700%
Boost Clock
2350 MHz+41%
1665 MHz
L2 Cache
8 MB+100%
4 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc Graphics 140T leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureArc Graphics 140TGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 140T has 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 140T and 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc Graphics 140TGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VRAM Capacity
Shared
8 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
System
448 GB/s
Bus Width
System
256-bit
L2 Cache
8 MB+100%
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureArc Graphics 140TGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).

FeatureArc Graphics 140TGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
NVENC (Ampere)
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
NVDEC (Ampere)
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 140T draws 35W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 140.4% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.

FeatureArc Graphics 140TGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
TDP
35W-83%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W-42%
600W
Power Connector
Integrated
8-pin
Length
0mm
242mm
Height
0mm
112mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
75-12%
Perf/Watt
128.6+27%
101.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc Graphics 140T came in at $350, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399. On MSRP, Arc Graphics 140T was 12.3% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.9 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 294.6% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140T (2025 vs 2020).

FeatureArc Graphics 140TGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP
$350-12%
$399
Performance per Dollar
12.9
50.9+295%
Codename
—
GA104
Release
January 6 2025
December 1 2020
Ranking
#409
#73
Search Arc Graphics 140T on AmazonSearch GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.