Arc Graphics 140T
Tesla K20m
Arc Graphics 140T vs Tesla K20m Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc Graphics 140T vs Tesla K20m FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Arc Graphics 140T vs Tesla K20m: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc Graphics 140T
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,849 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 828% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ✅Tesla K20m is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Arc Graphics 140T is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 225W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2025 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Tesla K20m
2013Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌814% HIGHER MSRP$3,199 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 12.9 G3D/$ ($3,199 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌542.9% higher power demand at 225W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 140T vs Tesla K20m Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc Graphics 140T
The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
Tesla K20m
The Tesla K20m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 140T scores 4,500 and the Tesla K20m reaches 4,432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140T is built on Xe+ while the Tesla K20m uses Kepler. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20m).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500+2% | 4,432 |
| Architecture | Xe+ | Kepler |
| Shading Units | 8 | 2496+31100% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+540% | 1.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140T has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tesla K20m carries 2 GB. Tesla K20m gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 140T and 64-bit on the Tesla K20m. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20m) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+540% | 1.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140T draws 35W versus the Tesla K20m's 225W — a 146.2% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 350W (Tesla K20m). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-84% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 128.6+553% | 19.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc Graphics 140T came in at $350, while the Tesla K20m launched at $3199. On MSRP, Arc Graphics 140T was 89.1% cheaper ($2849 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.9 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 1.4 (Tesla K20m) — the Arc Graphics 140T offers 821.4% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140T (2025 vs 2013).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350-89% | $3199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.9+821% | 1.4 |
| Codename | — | GK110 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | January 5 2013 |
| Ranking | #409 | #470 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 140T and Tesla K20m
