Celeron D 352 vs Ryzen 7 3700X
Celeron D 352
Ryzen 7 3700X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron D 352 is positioned at rank #1062 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron D 352
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 3700X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron D 352 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($140) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Cedar Mill (2006) / 65 nm) | ✨ Modern (Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron D 352 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+475%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($140) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron D 352 and Ryzen 7 3700X
Celeron D 352
The Celeron D 352 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 86 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 418 points. Launch price was $69.
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Celeron D 352 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 7 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron D 352 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Celeron D 352 uses the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron D 352 scores 418 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 192.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron D 352 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Celeron D 352 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 8 / 16+700% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz+38% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-89% |
| Architecture | Cedar Mill (2006) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 418 | 22,430+5266% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 180 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron D 352 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Celeron D 352 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Celeron D 352 supports 198% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron D 352) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 865G,915,945,965,G31,G41 (Celeron D 352) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Celeron D 352 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 4.0+264% |
| Max RAM Speed | 800+19900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 | 128 GB+3355443100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: false (Celeron D 352) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Primary use case: Celeron D 352 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron D 352 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.
| Feature | Celeron D 352 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | false | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron D 352 launched at $69 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. At current prices ($15 vs $140), the Celeron D 352 is $125 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron D 352 delivers 27.9 pts/$ vs 160.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 140.7% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron D 352 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $69-79% | $329 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-89% | $140 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.9 | 160.2+474% |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron D 352 and Ryzen 7 3700X
