
Celeron D 352

Ryzen 7 3700X
Celeron D 352 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron D 352 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron D 352 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron D 352
2006Why buy it
- β Costs $260 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Ryzen 7 3700X.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (418 vs 22,430).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($69 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β29.2% higher power demand at 84W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +2366.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Delivers 1025.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 6.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 84W, a 19W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- β376.8% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$69 MSRP
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron D 352.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Celeron D 352?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron D 352 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron D 352
The Celeron D 352 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 86 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 418 points. Launch price was $69.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Celeron D 352 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Ryzen 7 3700X has 7 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron D 352 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X β a 31.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Celeron D 352 uses the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron D 352 scores 418 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 β a 192.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron D 352 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Celeron D 352 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 8 / 16+700% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz+38% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-89% |
| Architecture | Cedar Mill (2006) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 418 | 22,430+5266% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 180 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron D 352 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Celeron D 352 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X β the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 300% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB β 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron D 352) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) β the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 865G,915,945,965,G31,G41 (Celeron D 352) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Celeron D 352 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 4.0+264% |
| Max RAM Speed | 800 | DDR4-3200+300% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 128 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: false (Celeron D 352) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Primary use case: Celeron D 352 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron D 352 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.
| Feature | Celeron D 352 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | false | β |
| Target Use | Budget | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron D 352 was priced at $69, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($69 vs $329), Celeron D 352 was $260 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron D 352 delivers 6.1 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X β making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 167.4% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron D 352 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $69-79% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 68.2+1018% |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














