EPYC 9374F vs Ryzen 7 3700X

AMD

EPYC 9374F

32 Cores64 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2022
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

EPYC 9374F vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9374F vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9374F vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9374F

2022

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +15.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
  • βœ…Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
  • βœ…433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($4,850 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • ❌392.3% higher power demand at 320W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $4,521 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 303.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 65W instead of 320W, a 255W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9374F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 82,009).
  • ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9374F, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
  • ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9374F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9374F better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 9374F makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9374F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 256 MB versus 32 MB.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9374F is the stronger fit. You are getting 265.6% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9374F is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 3700X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9374F comes in 1374.2% more expensive on MSRP at $4,850 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 3700X is also 303.2% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 16.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9374F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 256 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9374F vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9374F

The EPYC 9374F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022βˆ’2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,009 points. Launch price was $4,850.

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019βˆ’2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚑

Processing Power

The EPYC 9374F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads β€” the EPYC 9374F has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9374F versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X β€” a 2.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.85 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 9374F uses the Genoa (2022βˆ’2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019βˆ’2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9374F scores 82,009 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 β€” a 114.1% lead for the EPYC 9374F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9374F vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

FeatureEPYC 9374FRyzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+300%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz+2%
Base Clock
3.85 GHz+7%
3.6 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)+700%
32 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
512K (per core)+51100%
Process
5 nm, 6 nm-29%
7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture
Genoa (2022βˆ’2023)
Matisse (Zen 2) (2019βˆ’2020)
PassMark
82,009+266%
22,430
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9374F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9374F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X β€” the EPYC 9374F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9374F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β€” 4700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9374F) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9374F) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) β€” the EPYC 9374F offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9374F) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

FeatureEPYC 9374FRyzen 7 3700X
Socket
SP5
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
4800+50%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
6144 GB+4700%
128 GB
RAM Channels
12+500%
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+433%
24
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9374F) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Direct competitor: EPYC 9374F rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+.

FeatureEPYC 9374FRyzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
β€”
Unlocked
No
β€”
AVX-512
Yes
β€”
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP
β€”
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9374F was priced at $4850, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($4850 vs $329), Ryzen 7 3700X was $4521 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9374F delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X β€” making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 120.5% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9374FRyzen 7 3700X
MSRP
$4850
$329-93%
Performance per Dollar
16.9
68.2+304%
Release Date
2022
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.