FirePro W4300
GeForce RTX 3060
FirePro W4300 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W4300 vs GeForce RTX 3060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro W4300 vs GeForce RTX 3060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W4300
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 170W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 171mm instead of 242mm, a 71mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,719 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌15.2% HIGHER MSRP$379 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+525% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 620% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌240% higher power demand at 170W vs 50W.
- ❌41.5% longer card at 242mm vs 171mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W4300 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro W4300
The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro W4300 scores 2,719 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 525%. The FirePro W4300 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W4300) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,719 | 16,995+525% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 3584+367% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.428 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+792% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 48 | 112+133% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 3.5 MB+1742% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W4300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W4300 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W4300 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro W4300) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W4300) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.2.170 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2.170 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W4300) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W4300) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W4300 draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 109.1% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4300) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 171mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 71°C vs 75.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-71% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 171mm | 242mm |
| Height | 69mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 71°C-5% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 54.4 | 100.0+84% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W4300 came in at $379, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3060 was 13.2% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (FirePro W4300) vs 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 618.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379 | $329-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2 | 51.7+618% |
| Codename | Bonaire | GA106 |
| Release | December 1 2015 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #590 | #114 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W4300 and GeForce RTX 3060
