FirePro W4300
GeForce RTX 3070
FirePro W4300 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W4300 vs GeForce RTX 3070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro W4300 vs GeForce RTX 3070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W4300
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 220W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅Measures 171mm instead of 242mm, a 71mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,719 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+715.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 519.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌340% higher power demand at 220W vs 50W.
- ❌41.5% longer card at 242mm vs 171mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W4300 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro W4300
The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro W4300 scores 2,719 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 715.4%. The FirePro W4300 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W4300) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,719 | 22,172+715% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 5888+667% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.428 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+1322% |
| ROPs | 16 | 96+500% |
| TMUs | 48 | 184+283% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 5.8 MB+2953% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W4300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W4300 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 3070 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W4300 and 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro W4300) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W4300) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.2.170 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2.170 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W4300) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W4300) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W4300 draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 125.9% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4300) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 171mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 71°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-77% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 171mm | 242mm |
| Height | 69mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 71°C-5% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 54.4 | 100.8+85% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W4300 came in at $379, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499. On MSRP, FirePro W4300 was 24% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (FirePro W4300) vs 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 516.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3070 (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-24% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2 | 44.4+517% |
| Codename | Bonaire | GA104 |
| Release | December 1 2015 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #590 | #63 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W4300 and GeForce RTX 3070
