FirePro W4300
GeForce RTX 4070
FirePro W4300 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W4300 vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro W4300 vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W4300
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 171mm instead of 304mm, a 133mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,719 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+890% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 526.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
- ❌77.8% longer card at 304mm vs 171mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W4300 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro W4300
The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro W4300 scores 2,719 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 890%. The FirePro W4300 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W4300) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,719 | 26,919+890% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 5888+667% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.428 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+1941% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 48 | 184+283% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 5.8 MB+2953% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 36 MB+14300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FirePro W4300 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W4300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W4300 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W4300 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro W4300) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 36 MB+14300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W4300) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.2.170 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2.170 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W4300) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W4300) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W4300 draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 120% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4300) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 171mm vs 304mm, occupying 1 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 71°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-75% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 171mm | 304mm |
| Height | 69mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 1-67% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 71°C-11% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 54.4 | 134.6+147% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W4300 came in at $379, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, FirePro W4300 was 36.7% cheaper ($220 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (FirePro W4300) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 523.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-37% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2 | 44.9+524% |
| Codename | Bonaire | AD104 |
| Release | December 1 2015 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #590 | #32 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W4300 and GeForce RTX 4070
