FirePro W4300 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

FirePro W4300

2015Core: 930 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W4300

2015

Why buy it

  • +195.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 300W, a 250W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $240 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (921 vs 2,719).
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 500% higher power demand at 300W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro W4300 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 195.2% in PassMark G3D (2,719 vs 921), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W4300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $240 more expensive on MSRP at $379 vs $139, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 8.3% (7.2 vs 6.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro W4300 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W4300

The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 921 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro W4300 scores 2,719 versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E's 921 — the FirePro W4300 leads by 195.2%. The FirePro W4300 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E uses Bristol Ridge, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W4300) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E).

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
G3D Mark Score
2,719+195%
921
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Bristol Ridge
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
768
4096+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.428 TFLOPS
47.84 TFLOPS+3250%
ROPs
16
128+700%
TMUs
48
256+433%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
8 MB+3100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W4300 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E carries 512 MB. FirePro W4300 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W4300 and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro W4300) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
8 MB+3100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W4300 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E's 300W — a 142.9% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4300) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
TDP
50W-83%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
171mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
71°C
Perf/Watt
54.4+1655%
3.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W4300 came in at $379, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E was 63.3% cheaper ($240 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (FirePro W4300) vs 6.6 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the FirePro W4300 offers 9.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E (2025 vs 2015).

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
MSRP
$379
$139-63%
Performance per Dollar
7.2+9%
6.6
Codename
Bonaire
Navi 48
Release
December 1 2015
July 23 2025
Ranking
#590
#23

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.