GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Arc Graphics 140V
GeForce GTX 760 Ti
Popular choices:
Arc Graphics 140V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 140V is significantly newer (2024 vs 2013). The Arc Graphics 140V likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140V.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | Xe² (2024) (3nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $249 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140V, it costs 17% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 23.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+23.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($249) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 Ti and Arc Graphics 140V
GeForce GTX 760 Ti
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.
Arc Graphics 140V
The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti scores 5,307 and the Arc Graphics 140V reaches 5,168 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is built on Kepler while the Arc Graphics 140V uses Xe², both on 28 nm vs 3 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 8 (Arc Graphics 140V). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 2050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,307+3% | 5,168 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Xe² |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 3 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+35900% | 8 |
| Boost Clock | 928 MHz | 2050 MHz+121% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 140V has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12.2+11% |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs Xe Media Engine.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3rd Gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti draws 250W versus the Arc Graphics 140V's 15W — a 177.4% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 140V). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 15W-94% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 21.2 | 344.5+1525% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $249, while the Arc Graphics 140V launched at $350 and now averages $300. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti costs 17% less ($51 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.3 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 17.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) — the GeForce GTX 760 Ti offers 23.8% better value. The Arc Graphics 140V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-29% | $350 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $249-17% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.3+24% | 17.2 |
| Codename | GK110B | Lunar Lake iGPU |
| Release | November 7 2013 | September 24 2024 |
| Ranking | #278 | #434 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 760 Ti and Arc Graphics 140V
