G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
67.1% HIGHER MSRP
$249 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅14.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 147.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 21.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅GeForce GTX 760 Ti is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 48.3% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 5,307), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $249, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 147.8% (52.8 vs 21.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti scores 5,307 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 48.3%. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	5,307	7,869+48%
Architecture	Kepler	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2880+221%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.345 TFLOPS+79%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	928 MHz	1665 MHz+79%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	240+329%	56
L1 Cache	240 KB	896 KB+273%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760 Ti. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 Ti and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 760 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s+50%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	11_0	12+9%
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC 4th gen.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	NVENC 3rd Gen	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	NVDEC 1st Gen	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	—	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	250W	75W-70%
Recommended PSU	500W	300W-40%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	None
Length	241mm	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	21.2	104.9+395%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti came in at $249, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 40.2% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.3 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 147.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP	$249	$149-40%
Performance per Dollar	21.3	52.8+148%
Codename	GK110B	TU117
Release	November 7 2013	April 23 2019
Ranking	#278	#323

Search GeForce GTX 760 Ti on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.