GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Radeon Pro Vega 20

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013Core: 875 MHzBoost: 928 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon Pro Vega 20

2018Core: 815 MHzBoost: 1283 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Radeon Pro Vega 20 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2 GB 250

5,307

+2.7%

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Radeon Pro Vega 20

Shared System RAM 100

5,169

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Radeon Pro Vega 20 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Radeon Pro Vega 20: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013

Why buy it

✅12.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Radeon Pro Vega 20 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.

Radeon Pro Vega 20

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 12.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (5,307 vs 5,169), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 760 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Radeon Pro Vega 20 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon Pro Vega 20

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1283 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,169 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti scores 5,307 and the Radeon Pro Vega 20 reaches 5,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 3.284 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 1283 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 20
G3D Mark Score	5,307+3%	5,169
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 5.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2880+125%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.345 TFLOPS+63%	3.284 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	928 MHz	1283 MHz+38%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	240+200%	80
L1 Cache	240 KB	320 KB+33%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 20
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 760 Ti gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 Ti and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 20. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 20) — the GeForce GTX 760 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 20
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 20
DirectX	11_0	12 (12_1)+9%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 7.0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 20
Encoder	NVENC 3rd Gen	VCE 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 1st Gen	UVD 7.0
Codecs	—	H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 20's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 20
TDP	250W	100W-60%
Recommended PSU	500W	1W-100%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	Integrated
Length	241mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	21.2	51.7+144%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti came in at $249, while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro Vega 20 was 100+% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.3 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 20) — the Radeon Pro Vega 20 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro Vega 20 (2018 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 20
MSRP	$249	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	21.3	Infinity
Codename	GK110B	Vega 12
Release	November 7 2013	November 14 2018
Ranking	#278	#435

Search GeForce GTX 760 Ti on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro Vega 20 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.