GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Radeon R9 M395X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013Core: 875 MHzBoost: 928 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M395X

2015Core: 723 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Radeon R9 M395X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Radeon R9 M395X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Radeon R9 M395X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013

Why buy it

  • 1.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $351 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
  • Delivers 149.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.3 vs 8.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M395X

2015

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 141% HIGHER MSRP
    $600 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.5 vs 21.3 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (5,307 vs 5,120), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 760 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $351 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $600, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 149.8% (21.3 vs 8.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Radeon R9 M395X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.

AMD

Radeon R9 M395X

The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti scores 5,307 and the Radeon R9 M395X reaches 5,120 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M395X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M395X). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M395X).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiRadeon R9 M395X
G3D Mark Score
5,307+4%
5,120
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2880+41%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.345 TFLOPS+81%
2.961 TFLOPS
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
240+88%
128
L1 Cache
240 KB
512 KB+113%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+200%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M395X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiRadeon R9 M395X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M395X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 160 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395X) — a 20% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760 Ti. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 Ti and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M395X. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M395X) — the GeForce GTX 760 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiRadeon R9 M395X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s+20%
160 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+200%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti draws 250W versus the Radeon R9 M395X's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M395X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395X). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiRadeon R9 M395X
TDP
250W
75W-70%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
Mobile
Length
241mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
21.2
68.3+222%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti came in at $249, while the Radeon R9 M395X launched at $600. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 760 Ti was 58.5% cheaper ($351 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.3 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 8.5 (Radeon R9 M395X) — the GeForce GTX 760 Ti offers 150.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M395X (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiRadeon R9 M395X
MSRP
$249-59%
$600
Performance per Dollar
21.3+151%
8.5
Codename
GK110B
Amethyst
Release
November 7 2013
May 5 2015
Ranking
#278
#438

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.