
GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti

GeForce GTX 950
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 760 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 950 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 760 Ti.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 950 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 950 holds the technical lead. Priced at $48 (vs $249), it costs 81% less, resulting in a 423.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+423.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($48) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($249) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950 and GeForce GTX 760 Ti

GeForce GTX 950
The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 950 scores 5,357 and the GeForce GTX 760 Ti reaches 5,307 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950) vs 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 928 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,357 | 5,307 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2880+275% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.825 TFLOPS | 5.345 TFLOPS+193% |
| Boost Clock | 1188 MHz+28% | 928 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 48 | 240+400% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB+20% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 106 GB/s (GeForce GTX 950) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) — a 81.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 950) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 760 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 106 GB/s | 192 GB/s+81% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 11_0 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 950) vs NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd Gen | NVENC 3rd Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd Gen | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 950 draws 90W versus the GeForce GTX 760 Ti's 250W — a 94.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 202mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W-64% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 202mm | 241mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 59.5+181% | 21.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 950 launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $48, while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti launched at $249 and now averages $249. The GeForce GTX 950 costs 80.7% less ($201 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 111.6 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 21.3 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 950 offers 423.9% better value. The GeForce GTX 950 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-36% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $48-81% | $249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.6+424% | 21.3 |
| Codename | GM206 | GK110B |
| Release | August 20 2015 | November 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #425 | #278 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















