GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 950.

Insight	GeForce GTX 950	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 950 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950 and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

GeForce GTX 950

The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 950 scores 5,357 and the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM reaches 5,474 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950) vs 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 980 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
G3D Mark Score	5,357	5,474+2%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	1344+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.825 TFLOPS	2.634 TFLOPS+44%
Boost Clock	1188 MHz+21%	980 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	112+133%
L1 Cache	288 KB+157%	112 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 950 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 106 GB/s (GeForce GTX 950) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) — a 81.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 950) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) — the GeForce GTX 950 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	106 GB/s	192 GB/s+81%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
DirectX	12_1	12 (11_0)
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 950) vs 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 950) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM).

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Encoder	NVENC 2nd Gen	1st Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 2nd Gen	1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
Codecs	H.264,H.265	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 950 draws 90W versus the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM's 170W — a 61.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 202mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.