
GeForce GTX 950 vs Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

GeForce GTX 950
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 950.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN (2012−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 950 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 950 holds the technical lead. Priced at $48 (vs $75), it costs 36% less, resulting in a 52.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+52.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($48) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950 and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

GeForce GTX 950
The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2012. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 950 scores 5,357 and the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 2,560 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,357 | 5,500+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2560+233% |
| Boost Clock | 1188 MHz+32% | 900 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 950 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire has 4 GB. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 106 GB/s (GeForce GTX 950) vs 153.6 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) — a 44.9% advantage for the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit x2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 106 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s x2+45% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit x2+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 950 draws 90W versus the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire's 200W — a 75.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W-55% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 202mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 59.5+116% | 27.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 950 launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $48, while the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire launched at $300 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 950 costs 36% less ($27 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 111.6 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 73.3 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) — the GeForce GTX 950 offers 52.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 950 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-47% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $48-36% | $75 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.6+52% | 73.3 |
| Codename | GM206 | Neptune CF |
| Release | August 20 2015 | May 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #425 | #350 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















