
GeForce GTX 950
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 970M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 950
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 162W, a 72W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 970M SLI
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 33.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌80% higher power demand at 162W vs 90W.
GeForce GTX 950
2015GeForce GTX 970M SLI
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 162W, a 72W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 33.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌80% higher power demand at 162W vs 90W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 970M SLI better than GeForce GTX 950?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 950 make more sense than GeForce GTX 970M SLI?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 6 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 21 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 6 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 241 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 15 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950 and GeForce GTX 970M SLI

GeForce GTX 950
GeForce GTX 950
The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.

GeForce GTX 970M SLI
GeForce GTX 970M SLI
The GeForce GTX 970M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 162W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 950 scores 5,357 and the GeForce GTX 970M SLI reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 970M SLI uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 970M SLI). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,357 | 5,500+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2560+233% |
| Boost Clock | 1188 MHz+14% | 1038 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 950 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 970M SLI has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 970M SLI offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 106 GB/s (GeForce GTX 950) vs 120 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX 970M SLI) — a 1034% advantage for the GeForce GTX 970M SLI. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit x2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 106 GB/s | 120 GB/s x2+13% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit x2+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 970M SLI). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 950) vs NVENC (GeForce GTX 970M SLI). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs PureVideo HD (VP6). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 950) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 970M SLI).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd Gen | NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd Gen | PureVideo HD (VP6) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 950 draws 90W versus the GeForce GTX 970M SLI's 162W — a 57.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 970M SLI). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 202mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W-44% | 162W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 202mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 59.5+75% | 34.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 950 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159 | — |
| Codename | GM206 | — |
| Release | August 20 2015 | October 7 2014 |
| Ranking | #425 | #284 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













