
GeForce GTX 950

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce RTX 2060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce RTX 2060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 950
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $190 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 160W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 202mm instead of 229mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅181.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 20% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 33.7 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌77.8% higher power demand at 160W vs 90W.
- ❌13.4% longer card at 229mm vs 202mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 950
The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 950 scores 5,357 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 163.5%. The GeForce GTX 950 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,357 | 14,114+163% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1920+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.825 TFLOPS | 6.451 TFLOPS+253% |
| Boost Clock | 1188 MHz | 1680 MHz+41% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 48 | 120+150% |
| L1 Cache | 0.28 MB | 1.9 MB+579% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 950 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 950 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 2060 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 106 GB/s (GeForce GTX 950) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) — a 217% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 950) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 106 GB/s | 336 GB/s+217% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 950) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 950) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd Gen | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd Gen | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 950 draws 90W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 56% difference. The GeForce GTX 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 202mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W-44% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 202mm | 229mm |
| Height | — | 113mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 72 |
| Perf/Watt | 59.5 | 88.2+48% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 950 came in at $159, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 950 was 54.4% cheaper ($190 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 33.7 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 19.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2060 (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-54% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.7 | 40.4+20% |
| Codename | GM206 | TU106 |
| Release | August 20 2015 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #425 | #168 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















