GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950

2015Core: 1024 MHzBoost: 1188 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
RTX family
·······

GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 950

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $10 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.7 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • 107.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 88.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 33.7 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 107.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 100.7% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 5,357), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $10 more expensive on MSRP at $169 vs $159, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 88.8% (63.6 vs 33.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950

The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 950 scores 5,357 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 100.7%. The GeForce GTX 950 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 1470 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score
5,357
10,749+101%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
768
2304+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.825 TFLOPS
6.774 TFLOPS+271%
Boost Clock
1188 MHz
1470 MHz+24%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48
72+50%
L1 Cache
0.28 MB
2.3 MB+721%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 950 is capped at Upscaling support.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 950 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 106 GB/s (GeForce GTX 950) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 58.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 950) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
6 GB+200%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
106 GB/s
168 GB/s+58%
Bus Width
128-bit+33%
96-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX
12_1
12 Ultimate
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 950) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 950) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

FeatureGeForce GTX 950GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder
NVENC 2nd Gen
NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder
NVDEC 2nd Gen
NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs
H.264,H.265
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 950 draws 90W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 25% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 202mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP
90W
70W-22%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Length
202mm
160mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
59.5
153.6+158%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 950 came in at $159, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 950 was 5.9% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 33.7 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 88.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 950GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP
$159-6%
$169
Performance per Dollar
33.7
63.6+89%
Codename
GM206
GA107
Release
August 20 2015
February 2 2024
Ranking
#425
#252

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.