GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce GTX 950
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3070 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 950 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 313.9% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 950.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-313.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+313.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 950 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $48 versus $200 for the GeForce RTX 3070, it costs 76% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 0.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($48) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950 and GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce GTX 950
The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 950 scores 5,357 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 313.9%. The GeForce GTX 950 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,357 | 22,172+314% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 5888+667% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.825 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+1013% |
| Boost Clock | 1188 MHz | 1725 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 48 | 184+283% |
| L1 Cache | 0.28 MB | 5.8 MB+1971% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 950 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 106 GB/s (GeForce GTX 950) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 322.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 950) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 106 GB/s | 448 GB/s+323% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 950) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 950) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd Gen | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd Gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 950 draws 90W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 83.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 202mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W-59% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 202mm | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 59.5 | 100.8+69% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 950 launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $48, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The GeForce GTX 950 costs 76% less ($152 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 111.6 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce GTX 950 offers 0.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-68% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $48-76% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.6 | 110.9 |
| Codename | GM206 | GA104 |
| Release | August 20 2015 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #425 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 950 and GeForce RTX 3070
