Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GT 755M SLI
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 755M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is positioned at rank 282 and the GeForce GT 755M SLI is on rank 285, so the Iris Xe Graphics G7 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe Graphics G7
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The Iris Xe Graphics G7 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 755M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 755M SLI offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 755M SLI offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $100 for the Iris Xe Graphics G7, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 98.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+98.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce GT 755M SLI
Iris Xe Graphics G7
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
GeForce GT 755M SLI
The GeForce GT 755M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,280 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,311 and the GeForce GT 755M SLI reaches 3,280 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GeForce GT 755M SLI uses Kepler, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 768 (GeForce GT 755M SLI).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311 | 3,280 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Kepler |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 96 | 768+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 755M SLI has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 755M SLI offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M SLI). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+12% | 4.1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M SLI). Decoder: QuickSync vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M SLI).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC (1st Gen) |
| Decoder | QuickSync | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the GeForce GT 755M SLI's 2W — a 175% difference. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 350W (GeForce GT 755M SLI). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 2W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C-6% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.4 | 1640.0+1386% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce GT 755M SLI launched at $200 and now averages $50. The GeForce GT 755M SLI costs 50% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 65.6 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) — the GeForce GT 755M SLI offers 98.2% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $50-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.1 | 65.6+98% |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | N14P-? |
| Release | August 15 2020 | November 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #493 | #554 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce GT 755M SLI
