Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 680M
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 680M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is positioned at rank 282 and the GeForce GTX 680M is on rank 105, so the GeForce GTX 680M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe Graphics G7
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 680M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2012). The Iris Xe Graphics G7 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 680M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 680M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTX 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 680M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $100 for the Iris Xe Graphics G7, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 97.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTX 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+97.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce GTX 680M
Iris Xe Graphics G7
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
GeForce GTX 680M
The GeForce GTX 680M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 4 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 719 MHz to 758 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,277 points. Launch price was $310.50.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,311 and the GeForce GTX 680M reaches 3,277 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GeForce GTX 680M uses Kepler, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 680M).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTX 680M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311+1% | 3,277 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Kepler |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 96 | 1344+1300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTX 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 680M has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 680M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTX 680M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTX 680M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 680M). Decoder: QuickSync vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 680M).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTX 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) |
| Decoder | QuickSync | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 680M's 100W — a 107.7% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 680M). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 81°C.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTX 680M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-70% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 81°C-5% |
| Perf/Watt | 110.4+237% | 32.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 680M costs 50% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 65.5 (GeForce GTX 680M) — the GeForce GTX 680M offers 97.9% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2012).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTX 680M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $50-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.1 | 65.5+98% |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | GK104 |
| Release | August 15 2020 | June 4 2012 |
| Ranking | #493 | #561 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce GTX 680M
