Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is positioned at rank #282 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe Graphics G7
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 853.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (12 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe Graphics G7.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-853.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+853.7%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $100), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 61.6% better value per dollar than the Iris Xe Graphics G7.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+61.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Iris Xe Graphics G7
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,311 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 853.7%. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 10 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311 | 31,578+854% |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 96 | 7680+7900% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 192-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | QuickSync | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 161.9% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-89% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 700W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 285mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 110.4 | 110.8 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 costs 83.1% less ($490 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 61.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-75% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-83% | $590 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.1 | 53.5+62% |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | AD104 |
| Release | August 15 2020 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #493 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
