Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 590

Iris Xe Graphics G7

2020

GeForce GTX 590

2011Core: 607 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Iris Xe Graphics G7

3,311

0.0%

HD Graphics 630

Iris Plus Graphics 645

Iris Plus Graphics 950

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

3,341

+0.9%

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

GeForce RTX 5060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is positioned at rank #282 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe Graphics G7

#61

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

MSRP: $800|Avg: $350

93%

#272

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

656%

#274

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

594%

#275

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

593%

#279

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

539%

#280

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

535%

#282

Iris Xe Graphics G7

MSRP: $200|Avg: $100

100%

#283

Radeon R9 M395

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

99%

#285

GeForce GT 755M SLI

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

99%

#286

GeForce GTX 950A

MSRP: $159|Avg: $30

99%

#288

Radeon 540X

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

97%

#289

GeForce 930MX

MSRP: $80|Avg: $25

96%

#291

GeForce MX250

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

96%

#292

Radeon 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

95%

#293

GeForce MX330

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

95%

#296

Radeon RX 780

MSRP: $499|Avg: $721

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2011). The Iris Xe Graphics G7 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 590 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 590 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (3 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe Graphics G7.

Insight	Iris Xe Graphics G7	GeForce GTX 590
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Longevity	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 590 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $100 (vs $100), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 0.9% better value per dollar than the Iris Xe Graphics G7.

Insight	Iris Xe Graphics G7	GeForce GTX 590
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+0.9%)
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 590 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce GTX 590

Iris Xe Graphics G7

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

GeForce GTX 590

The GeForce GTX 590 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,341 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,311 and the GeForce GTX 590 reaches 3,341 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GeForce GTX 590 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 590).

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7	GeForce GTX 590
G3D Mark Score	3,311	3,341
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	10 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	96	1024 ×2+967%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7	GeForce GTX 590
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 590 has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 590 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7	GeForce GTX 590
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	3 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	256-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 590). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7	GeForce GTX 590
DirectX	12.1	12 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: QuickSync vs PureVideo HD (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 590).

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7	GeForce GTX 590
Encoder	QuickSync	—
Decoder	QuickSync	PureVideo HD (VP5)
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 590's 365W — a 169.6% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 700W (GeForce GTX 590). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 90°C.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7	GeForce GTX 590
TDP	30W-92%	365W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	700W
Power Connector	Integrated	2x 8-pin
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	85°C-6%	90°C
Perf/Watt	110.4+1100%	9.2

💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce GTX 590 launched at $699 and now averages $100. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 33.4 (GeForce GTX 590) — the GeForce GTX 590 offers 0.9% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2011).