Iris Xe Graphics G7
VS
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7

2020
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

2011Core: 783 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is positioned at rank #282 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe Graphics G7

#61
GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
MSRP: $800|Avg: $350
93%
#272
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
656%
#274
594%
#275
593%
#279
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
539%
#280
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
535%
#282
Iris Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $200|Avg: $100
100%
#283
Radeon R9 M395
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#285
GeForce GT 755M SLI
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
99%
#286
GeForce GTX 950A
MSRP: $159|Avg: $30
99%
#288
Radeon 540X
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
97%
#289
GeForce 930MX
MSRP: $80|Avg: $25
96%
#291
GeForce MX250
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#292
Radeon 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
95%
#293
GeForce MX330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
95%
#296
Radeon RX 780
MSRP: $499|Avg: $721
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2011). The Iris Xe Graphics G7 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe Graphics G7.

InsightIris Xe Graphics G7GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Longevity
Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $100 for the Iris Xe Graphics G7, it costs 70% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 235.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightIris Xe Graphics G7GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+235.3%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,331 points.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,311 and the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 reaches 3,331 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
G3D Mark Score
3,311
3,331
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
10 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
96
192+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
DirectX
12.1
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Decoder: QuickSync vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Encoder
QuickSync
PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder
QuickSync
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2's 106W — a 111.8% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 400W (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 68°C.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
TDP
30W-72%
106W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
400W
Power Connector
Integrated
1x 6-pin
Length
210mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
68°C-20%
Perf/Watt
110.4+252%
31.4
💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 launched at $129 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 costs 70% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 111.0 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) — the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 offers 235.3% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2011).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
MSRP
$200
$129-36%
Avg Price (30d)
$100
$30-70%
Performance per Dollar
33.1
111.0+235%
Codename
Tiger Lake Xe
GF116
Release
August 15 2020
March 15 2011
Ranking
#493
#739