Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce RTX 4060
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is positioned at rank #282 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe Graphics G7
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 490.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe Graphics G7.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-490.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+490.4%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $299 (vs $100), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 97.5% better value per dollar than the Iris Xe Graphics G7.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+97.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce RTX 4060
Iris Xe Graphics G7
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,311 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 490.4%. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 10 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311 | 19,548+490% |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 96 | 3072+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 272 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | QuickSync | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 117.2% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 73°C.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-74% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 73°C-14% |
| Perf/Watt | 110.4 | 170.0+54% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 and now averages $299. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 costs 66.6% less ($199 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 97.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-33% | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-67% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.1 | 65.4+98% |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | AD107 |
| Release | August 15 2020 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #493 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce RTX 4060
