MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs GeForce GTX 1060

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is positioned at rank #16 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

#6

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

124%

#8

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

112%

#9

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

112%

#13

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

102%

#14

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

101%

#16

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#18

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

99%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 281.6% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M.

Insight	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce GTX 1060
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-281.6%)	✅Leading raw performance (+281.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+200%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1060 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and GeForce GTX 1060

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M scores 2,637 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 281.6%. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060).

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score	2,637	10,064+282%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	40 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	384	2560+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9523 TFLOPS	8.873 TFLOPS+832%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	64	160+150%
L1 Cache	512 KB	960 KB+88%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	6 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	192-bit+200%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce GTX 1060
DirectX	11.0	12+9%
OpenGL	4.2	4.5+7%
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: VP4 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce GTX 1060
Encoder	PureVideo HD	NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	VP4	NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs	MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 57.1% difference. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce GTX 1060
TDP	100W-44%	180W
Recommended PSU	350W-13%	400W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	6-pin
Length	—	173mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	26.4	55.9+112%