MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon Pro WX 3100
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is positioned at rank 16 and the Radeon Pro WX 3100 is on rank 113, so the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 3100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 3100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and Radeon Pro WX 3100
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.
Radeon Pro WX 3100
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 12 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,584 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M scores 2,637 and the Radeon Pro WX 3100 reaches 2,584 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 3100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 512 (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3100).
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,637+2% | 2,584 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9523 TFLOPS | 1.248 TFLOPS+31% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 3100 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3100). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (12_0)+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6+10% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 3100).
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) |
| Decoder | VP4 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3100's 65W — a 42.4% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 65W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 26.4 | 39.8+51% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $65 |
| Codename | GF114 | Lexa |
| Release | March 22 2012 | June 12 2017 |
| Ranking | #704 | #624 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and Radeon Pro WX 3100
