Quadro FX 350M vs Radeon Xpress 1300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 350M vs Radeon Xpress 1300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 350M vs Radeon Xpress 1300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 350M

2008

Why buy it

✅+12.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌122.4% higher power demand at 189W vs 85W.

Radeon Xpress 1300M

2019

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Quadro FX 350M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Xpress 1300M is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 85W instead of 189W, a 104W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (40 vs 45).
❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 350M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 12.5% in PassMark G3D (45 vs 40), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Xpress 1300M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 350M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 350M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Xpress 1300M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 350M vs Radeon Xpress 1300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 350M

The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon Xpress 1300M

The Radeon Xpress 1300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 350M scores 45 versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 40 — the Quadro FX 350M leads by 12.5%. The Quadro FX 350M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon Xpress 1300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 350M) vs 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300M).

Feature	Quadro FX 350M	Radeon Xpress 1300M
G3D Mark Score	45+13%	40
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	240	1280+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	3.2 TFLOPS+414%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	80
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 350M	Radeon Xpress 1300M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 350M has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Xpress 1300M carries 512 MB. Radeon Xpress 1300M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 350M and 64-bit on the Radeon Xpress 1300M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 350M) vs 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300M) — the Radeon Xpress 1300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 350M	Radeon Xpress 1300M
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.

Feature	Quadro FX 350M	Radeon Xpress 1300M
Max Displays	1	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 350M) vs None (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP1) vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9 (Quadro FX 350M) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon Xpress 1300M).

Feature	Quadro FX 350M	Radeon Xpress 1300M
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP1)	None
Codecs	MPEG-2,WMV9	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 350M draws 189W versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 85W — a 75.9% difference. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 350M) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.