Quadro FX 350M vs Radeon Xpress 1300M
Quadro FX 350M
Popular choices:
Radeon Xpress 1300M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 350M is positioned at rank 228 and the Radeon Xpress 1300M is on rank 363, so the Quadro FX 350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 350M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Xpress 1300M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Xpress 1300M is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The Radeon Xpress 1300M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 350M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 350M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 12.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Xpress 1300M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 350M | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+12.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-12.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 350M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 350M and Radeon Xpress 1300M
Quadro FX 350M
The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Radeon Xpress 1300M
The Radeon Xpress 1300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 350M scores 45 versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 40 — the Quadro FX 350M leads by 12.5%. The Quadro FX 350M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon Xpress 1300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 350M) vs 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300M).
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 45+13% | 40 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 1280+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 3.2 TFLOPS+414% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 350M comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Xpress 1300M has 512 MB. The Radeon Xpress 1300M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 350M) vs 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300M) — the Radeon Xpress 1300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 1 | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 350M) vs None (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP1) vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9 (Quadro FX 350M) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon Xpress 1300M).
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP1) | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 350M draws 189W versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 85W — a 75.9% difference. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 350M) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 85W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.5+150% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 350M and Radeon Xpress 1300M
