
Quadro T1000 vs FirePro W8100

Quadro T1000
Popular choices:

FirePro W8100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro T1000 is positioned at rank 90 and the FirePro W8100 is on rank 254, so the Quadro T1000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W8100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro T1000 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro T1000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W8100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W8100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro T1000.
| Insight | Quadro T1000 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.7%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W8100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $425 for the Quadro T1000, it costs 53% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 122.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro T1000 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+122.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($425) | ✅More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 and FirePro W8100

Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.

FirePro W8100
The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro T1000 scores 6,505 and the FirePro W8100 reaches 6,812 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 is built on Turing while the FirePro W8100 uses GCN 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,505 | 6,812+5% |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro T1000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W8100 has 8 GB. The FirePro W8100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000) vs 12 (FirePro W8100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W8100).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T1000 draws 50W versus the FirePro W8100's 220W — a 125.9% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000) vs 350W (FirePro W8100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 156mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 87°C.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-77% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 156mm | 241mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-25% | 87°C |
| Perf/Watt | 130.1+320% | 31.0 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro T1000 launched at $400 MSRP and currently averages $425, while the FirePro W8100 launched at $2499 and now averages $200. The FirePro W8100 costs 52.9% less ($225 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.3 (Quadro T1000) vs 34.1 (FirePro W8100) — the FirePro W8100 offers 122.9% better value. The Quadro T1000 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400-84% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $425 | $200-53% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.3 | 34.1+123% |
| Codename | TU117 | Hawaii |
| Release | May 27 2019 | June 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #376 | #361 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















