Quadro T1000 vs Quadro M4000
Quadro T1000
Popular choices:
Quadro M4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro T1000 is positioned at rank 90 and the Quadro M4000 is on rank 159, so the Quadro T1000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M4000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro T1000 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro T1000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro T1000.
| Insight | Quadro T1000 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro M4000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $350 versus $425 for the Quadro T1000, it costs 18% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 24.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro T1000 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+24.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($425) | ✅More affordable ($350) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 and Quadro M4000
Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.
Quadro M4000
The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro T1000 scores 6,505 and the Quadro M4000 reaches 6,679 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 is built on Turing while the Quadro M4000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 1013 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,505 | 6,679+3% |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz+44% | 1013 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro T1000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M4000 has 8 GB. The Quadro M4000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs 1st Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | 1st Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T1000 draws 50W versus the Quadro M4000's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000) vs 350W (Quadro M4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 156mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 82°C.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-50% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 156mm | 241mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-21% | 82°C |
| Perf/Watt | 130.1+95% | 66.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro T1000 launched at $400 MSRP and currently averages $425, while the Quadro M4000 launched at $791 and now averages $350. The Quadro M4000 costs 17.6% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.3 (Quadro T1000) vs 19.1 (Quadro M4000) — the Quadro M4000 offers 24.8% better value. The Quadro T1000 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400-49% | $791 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $425 | $350-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.3 | 19.1+25% |
| Codename | TU117 | GM204 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | August 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #376 | #392 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro T1000 and Quadro M4000
