
Quadro T1000
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro T1000 is positioned at rank 90 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is on rank 160, so the Quadro T1000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro T1000.
| Insight | Quadro T1000 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,574 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro T1000 scores 6,505 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design reaches 6,574 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,505 | 6,574+1% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz+21% | 1200 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T1000 draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design's 50W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 156mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-13% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 130.1 | 131.5+1% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $425 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | TU117 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | April 2 2020 |
| Ranking | #376 | #371 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















