Quadro T1000
VS
GRID P40-3Q

Quadro T1000 vs GRID P40-3Q

NVIDIA

Quadro T1000

2019Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1455 MHz
VS

GRID P40-3Q

2013Core: 745 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro T1000 is positioned at rank 90 and the GRID P40-3Q is on rank 341, so the Quadro T1000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000

#49
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
94%
#50
92%
#51
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015
91%
#52
RTX A1000
MSRP: $749|Avg: $500
89%
#54
Radeon Pro 5700
MSRP: $799|Avg: $250
88%
#55
Quadro P4000
MSRP: $815|Avg: $290
86%
#75
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
909%
#90
Quadro T1000
MSRP: $400|Avg: $425
100%
#93
Radeon Pro 580
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
95%
#94
T1000 8GB
MSRP: $500|Avg: $380
94%
#99
Quadro K620
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
91%
#100
Tesla K20Xm
MSRP: $7699|Avg: N/A
90%
#105
Quadro T2000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-3Q

#117
L40
MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174
91%
#326
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
12846%
#341
GRID P40-3Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
100%
#342
GRID M10-2Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
94%
#343
Tesla K80
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50
93%
#344
GRID M10-4Q
MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340
92%
#346
GRID M10-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
90%
#347
FirePro V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170
90%
#348
Quadro FX 3800
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
90%
#350
GRID K520
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50
85%
#351
GRID P40-12Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
84%
#352
FirePro 2270
MSRP: $149|Avg: $30
83%
#353
FirePro 2460
MSRP: $180|Avg: $10
82%
#355
FirePro 3D V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
79%
#356
Quadro FX 580
MSRP: $199|Avg: $500
79%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro T1000 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The Quadro T1000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID P40-3Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID P40-3Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro T1000.

InsightQuadro T1000GRID P40-3Q
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Leading raw performance (+1%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro T1000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $425 versus $5,699 for the GRID P40-3Q, it costs 93% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1227.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro T1000GRID P40-3Q
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1227.7%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($425)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,699)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 and GRID P40-3Q

NVIDIA

Quadro T1000

The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-3Q

The GRID P40-3Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,570 points. Launch price was $469.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T1000 scores 6,505 and the GRID P40-3Q reaches 6,570 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 is built on Turing while the GRID P40-3Q uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm.

FeatureQuadro T1000GRID P40-3Q
G3D Mark Score
6,505
6,570
Architecture
Turing
Kepler
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro T1000GRID P40-3Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureQuadro T1000GRID P40-3Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000) vs 12 (11_0) (GRID P40-3Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro T1000GRID P40-3Q
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000) vs Tesla NVENC x24 (GRID P40-3Q). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs Tesla NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000) vs H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-3Q).

FeatureQuadro T1000GRID P40-3Q
Encoder
5th Gen NVENC (Turing)
Tesla NVENC x24
Decoder
4th Gen NVDEC
Tesla NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T1000 draws 50W versus the GRID P40-3Q's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000) vs 350W (GRID P40-3Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 156mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85°C.

FeatureQuadro T1000GRID P40-3Q
TDP
50W-78%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
156mm
267mm
Height
69mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
65°C-24%
85°C
Perf/Watt
130.1+346%
29.2
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro T1000 launched at $400 MSRP and currently averages $425, while the GRID P40-3Q launched at $5699 and now averages $5699. The Quadro T1000 costs 92.5% less ($5274 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.3 (Quadro T1000) vs 1.2 (GRID P40-3Q) — the Quadro T1000 offers 1175% better value. The Quadro T1000 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro T1000GRID P40-3Q
MSRP
$400-93%
$5699
Avg Price (30d)
$425-93%
$5699
Performance per Dollar
15.3+1175%
1.2
Codename
TU117
GK104
Release
May 27 2019
June 28 2013
Ranking
#376
#628